Sexual Healthcare

  • Harsh Reality
  • Title X in Texas
  • Sex @ Tech
  • About

What are Title X funds?

November 18, 2014 by Lucinda Holt Leave a Comment

“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
-Benjamin Franklin

American politicians like to think their policies have ideological roots in the Founding Fathers’ wisdom. Back in 1970, President Richard Nixon passed what was known as the Title X Family Planning Program, a bill supported by the vast majority of Congress, with the goal of ensuring counseling and contraceptive coverage for low-income, uninsured Americans. After signing it, Nixon said, “The bill before me today, the ‘Family Planning Services and Population Research Act of 1970,’ completes the legislation I requested in my message on population. This measure provides for expanded research, training of manpower, and increased family planning services. In addition, it provides for the development of family planning and population growth information and education.”

Forty-four years later, Title X funding reduces the cost burden of family planning services for about 4.8 million Americans, according to the most recent 2012 Family Planning Annual Report from the Office of Public Affairs. The logic behind the law is to prevent unintended pregnancies for destitute adults, which should give them more control of their sexual well-being. According to the report, more than nine out 10 users were women; 71 percent had family income levels below the $23,050 poverty threshold. Sixty-four percent were uninsured, and 49 percent were under 25 years old. Men, of course, are not excluded from the services offered. They can get tested for STDs — a useful service with Lubbock having the 17th highest syphilis rate in Texas — and seek out sexual health counseling.

The contraceptive services end at contraceptive education, but the program has nonetheless been conflated with the abortion battle being waged in the state. This is mainly due to the fact Planned Parenthood affiliates, offering family planning services along with abortions, receive funding from the program. Even though Title X has become targeted in recent years, its services actually are designed to prevent abortions from happening through preventive care.

An August 2014 study by the Guttmacher Institute found Title X clinics helped prevent 1.1 million unintended pregnancies in 2012, which would have led to about 527,000 unintended births and 363,000 abortions. It also turns out these clinics save government spending as well; another key finding in the study was publicly funded clinics saved the federal and state governments about $7.6 billion in 2010 — with Title X services accounting for $5.6 billion of it.

With Title X funds facing budget cuts a few years ago and Planned Parenthood of Texas facing political fallout from the state’s stance on abortion, state health groups applied for the Title X federal grant in 2012 to control the money.

In 2013, Women’s Health and Family Planning Association of Texas became the voice of Title X for the state.
Fran Hagerty, the agency’s CEO, signs off on her email’s with a quote from a speech delivered to Congress by former President Nixon in 1969.

“It is my view that no American woman should be denied access to family planning assistance because of her economic condition.”

 

 

 

Previous: An About-Face with Title X Funds                                                                                                                                                                                                       Next:Abortion Clinics

Filed Under: Generation Healthcare, Title X in Texas, Top Feed

Abortion Clinics

November 10, 2014 by Lucinda Holt Leave a Comment

Abortion clinics may be a thing of the past for the Lubbock area, but the issue is still alive. With House Bill 2 in full swing, women are struggling trying to obtain reproductive services; the women in this area are no exception.

The restrictions implemented by HB2 has closed the majority of abortion clinics in Texas, including Planned Parenthood of Lubbock. Women in this region who are in search of these services are making five-hour trips to the nearest provider.

Administrative nurse, Gloria Martinez, said Hilltop Women’s Reproductive Clinic in El Paso, Texas, was referring patients to its New Mexico clinic while its abortion services were on hold and women are suffering at the hands of lawmakers. As El Paso’s sole abortion provider, the clinic is back in service after the U.S. Supreme Court intervened in the closures by placing HB2’s provisions on hold.

“They’re being denied rights previously granted to them by the federal government,” Martinez said, “and our community is fortunate to have the women’s reproductive clinic in Santa Teresa — which is only seven miles from El Paso — whereas many other communities aren’t as fortunate.”

She said the staff includes board certified doctors who do not perform abortions past 15 weeks. While that option is available, she said, the decisions that have been made regarding this topic are a major infringement on women’s rights.

“I say this is intervening in something that is very personal. Our constitution has given us the right to make these personal decisions, and when it comes to women,” she said, “I feel like this is nothing the federal government should intervene in because they are stepping in and taking away our rights. Like I said, many women do this for different reasons, and what this decision is going to do for women is make them feel like second-class citizens.”

She said the need for this procedure is often personal for these people as they have even dealt with cases involving rape. She said regardless of their beliefs, they are strongly against women using this as a method of birth control.

The state legislature website shows HB2 places tougher restrictions on abortion procedures and clinic standards by banning termination of pregnancy after 20 weeks and mandating surgical centers within clinics.

The bill also indicates the doctor performing the abortion must have admitting privileges at a hospital within a 30-mile radius of the facility.

Tabitha Collier, sexual health advocate and Texas Tech University student, is an active voice on campus. As clinics reopen their doors across Texas, she said it was a good move on the Supreme Court’s behalf.

“I’m definitely for more places being open,” Collier said, “because even if they are against abortions for an unplanned pregnancy – like you actually got pregnant, you weren’t trying to – there’s abortions for medical reasons, and those may be matters of life or death.”


(Abortion Clinics In Texas)

She said the closures force women requiring a medically critical abortion to travel, as well. Scheduling conflicts, traveling distance, financial means and personal reasons, she said, may push individuals to dangerous alternatives.

Eric Finley, University Medical Center representative, said the center’s medical records do not indicate any self-induced abortion cases over the past year, but it has occurred in the past.

Collier said some women may find it difficult to seek help because of the moral issues surrounding this topic.

“I would hope they would have somebody that they could ask for help,” she said, “and if money is an issue, a lot of these people don’t want to ask their family or their friends for money because of the social stigma.”

She said she knows women who have faced this situation, but they were fortunate to have support.

Outside Holden Hall on a warm day, a young blonde woman sat independently while smoking a cigarette as leaves blew over the ground around her. Her accent was heavy as she explained this is her first month living in the U.S. While she enjoys her new home in Texas, she said, she finds the laws and morals regarding sexual health unusual.

Marine Marty is a 19-year-old student from Limoges, France. Marty said the one thing she has noticed is people have placed a taboo on sexuality, and that includes sexual education and health care.

“It’s so different here,” Marty said. “In France, we have access to abortion and to health system in general. We don’t have to pay for abortions, and it’s really nice because people and students are really aware of what they can do if it happens to them, and we have people in universities to help you and give you advice on how to practice abortion in an anonymous way.”

She said traveling for an abortion complicates the situation for women. For years, she said, women have struggled to have these rights, and now that there are restrictions, she said she feels society has regressed in regard toward women’s rights.

Nurse Martinez said, as of now, the El Paso clinic does not offer transportation to its sister clinic in New Mexico, but they are willing to look into that option to ease the burden for women who may find themselves in this situation.

She said she has seen the regression while on the border as residents from the neighboring city of Juarez, Mexico, come into her clinic, and her observation is Mexico is more progressive than Texas when it comes to abortion laws.

“In Mexico, women are progressing in this issue,” Martinez said. “In the United States, we are regressing.”

 

 

Previous: What are Title X Funds?                                                                                                                                                                                              Next: Sexual Health at Texas Tech

 

 

 

Feature Image Credit Tumblr

Filed Under: Abortion Clinics, Title X in Texas, Top Feed

Abortion Clinics in Texas

November 10, 2014 by Anibal Galindo Leave a Comment

Filed Under: Abortion Clinics, Bottom Feed, Title X in Texas

Hub%20logo

Facebook_Logo

twitter-icon

Copyright © 2026 · Agency Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in